Tip: We Might Have Been Wrong About Diabetes

All of us diet and nutrition types were pretty sure we knew all the causes of Type 2 diabetes. Whenever the topic came up, we’d look for the nearest soapbox, hook our thumbs in our suspenders, and start to drone on about its causes. We’d tell you how this here disease, folks, is brought about by obesity and physical inactivity in general, but that there’s a genetic component, too, friends and neighbors, and that it’s more prevalent in African Americans, American Indians, Hispanics, and Pacific Islanders. We’d then stroke our chins and get all sciency, blathering about how all you were all led astray by the devil and ate too much sugar and carbs or food in general and it forced your pancreas to work overtime until it, like John Henry competing against that steam-powered drill, plain tuckered out. Insulin resistance ensued, followed by fatness and inflammation and flop sweat. And then some of us would try to sell you an elixir to cure the disease. Even so, none of us really knew the exact molecular mechanism by which all this occurred. It may be, though, that some scientists at the University of California, San Diego, just kicked that soapbox out from beneath our feet. They found that when test subjects – either healthy or diabetic – ate a high-calorie, high-carbohydrate meal, it led to insulin receptors on cells in the bloodstream being literally EATEN away, paving the way to insulin resistance and diabetes. What They Did Professor Paul J. Mills and his colleagues recruited 30 people who fell into one of three groups: healthy, pre-diabetic, or Type 2 diabetic. All of them were then fed a McDonald’s breakfast consisting of an Egg McMuffin, two hash browns, a glass of orange juice, and a McCafe hot chocolate. Blood tests were taken before and after the meal. What They Found After eating the high-calorie, high-carb meal, participants from all three groups exhibited higher amounts of enzymes in their bloodstreams. These enzymes, initially released in the stomach to digest the McDonald’s meal, leaked through the gut and then continued to digest proteins, including the insulin receptors on cells in the bloodstream. Normally, these enzymes (proteases, in this case) remain in the stomach, but something about this meal – either the high calories, the high amount of carbs, or the processed nature of the meal – caused intestinal permeability to increase, enabling the digestive enzymes to continue on their destructive path. While, as stated, this “leaky gut” thing happened in participants from all three groups, the amount of proteases was lower, and returned to normal more quickly, in the healthy group. What This Info Means to You You see what happened here? Eating a junk-food meal could allow proteases to eat up insulin receptors on cells, thereby mucking up the body’s ability to regulate glucose levels and thus, potentially, leading to diabetes. The previous thinking was that a person had to eat like crap for a long time to damage his insulin sensitivity, but this study suggests that even one bad meal can have a dramatic effect. Obviously, there are questions to be answered, like what, specifically, about high carbs or high calories caused the proteases to leak through the gut? (Was it because the breakfast itself was inflammatory and caused the release of zonulin, the protein that regulates the gaps and fissures in the intestinal lining?) And secondly, just how long does the damage incurred by these leaked enzymes last? Their results may have also presented a therapeutic target for the prevention of Type 2 diabetes in that it may be possible in the future to block the activity of the digestive enzymes once they breached the intestinal tract. In the meantime, we might all want to start thinking about the wisdom, or at least the frequency, of “cheat meals” as they may be doing more harm than we
Origin: Tip: We Might Have Been Wrong About Diabetes

Tip: Do You HAVE to Count Calories?

Is there a way to avoid overeating without having to count calories? Or is it just a “go by how you feel” and “adjust as you go” thing? Well, the intuitive approach to eating can work great IF you’ve had enough experiences in the trenches of weighing, measuring, and adjusting your food. Intuition is not magic; it’s a natural consequence of experience and practice. If you don’t have the experience and practice, you can’t possibly develop intuition. Based on that, you can definitely use the “go by how you feel” approach. I like to use a combination of subjective and objective measures. The subjective measure I use is called HEC (hunger, energy, cravings) or SHMEC (sleep, hunger, mood, energy, cravings). These are acronyms I came up with to help my clients have a window into their hormonal functioning/balance. If your HEC or SHMEC is in check, your hormonal system is likely balanced and the approach you’re using is going to be far more sustainable. The objective feedback comes from body composition results. Here’s Something to Consider Those eating low calories and burning a lot of calories (dieters) and those eating a ton of calories and burning none (couch potatoes) both suffer from HEC/SHMEC being out of check. That’s because both of these metabolic states, when taken to the extreme, are a stress to the system. What does the metabolism do when it encounters a significant stress? It tries to get back to balance. It does so by making you move less (less energy, less motivation) and eat more (increased hunger and cravings). Remember, most stressful things the body encounters will turn on our ancient survival software – the starvation response. Now that you understand, you have a tool to know if you’re going too far with things. Be aware also that the EMEM (eat more exercise more) system of eating can easily move into an EMEL (eat more exercise less) regime if you’re not careful. (More info here: The Anabolic Toggle.) There are several things we know that can keep a lid on the compensatory mechanisms of the metabolism. First, make sure you’re balancing any training with plenty of rest and recovery. Athletes train hard, eat plenty, and spend a lot of time resting and recovering. You should do the same. Control those stress hormones. They’re highly correlated with increased food-seeking behavior. Another trick is to raise your calories the smart way. What a lot of people do is go for burgers, pizza, nut butters, and guacamole. These foods make it easier to increase your calories, but they also make you eat more at the current meal and crave the same kinds of foods at future meals. This is why I’m not a fan of cheat meals and refeeds done with highly palatable hedonistic foods. Keep your food choices on the blander side. The combination of salt, sugar, starch, fat, and alcohol will light up the reward centers in your brain like the Rockefeller Center Christmas tree. Use these three tips: Read the hormone signals (HEC and SHMEC). Pay attention to rest, relaxation, and recovery. Keep to a more bland diet.
Origin: Tip: Do You HAVE to Count Calories?