Avoid the Trend Traps!

It’s a Trap! The pattern just keeps repeating itself. A “new” exercise or diet trend comes along, the mainstream crowd jumps on it, eventually gets bored, and moves on to the next big thing. Even trainers and coaches can fall into the trend trap. We need to avoid getting caught up in these fitness and nutrition trends. We need to focus instead on the basic principles that always work and will never go out of style. To do that, let’s look back and see what lessons we’ve learned so far. Workout Trends In the 70’s and 80’s there was an explosion in isolation exercises and bodybuilding-style training among men. And while actual women bodybuilders existed, it was fairly uncommon for the average woman to want to build muscle. Nautilus machines made their debut in 1970 and isolating muscle groups became a trend. Aerobics like jogging, Jazzercise, and step classes took off. Many of these introduced small dumbbells, but their emphasis stayed on cardio. Some of these programs made their way to video cassette by the late 80’s and early 90’s (Buns of Steel, The Firm) and people began “toning up” in the privacy of their living room. In the late 90’s exercising on stability balls or wobbly boards became known as the hot new thing celebrities did with their expensive personal trainers. This gained mass appeal and the trend trickled into the masses by the 2000’s. Somehow it became known as “functional” training. Group fitness classes like Les Mills Body Pump (which required a lightly-loaded barbell and hundreds of reps to get a “burn”) also began to take off in the late 90’s and early 2000’s. In the 2000’s group circuit training and boot camp-style workouts blew up. Some were called “MMA workouts” or “hardcore” or “underground” workouts. These classes emphasized getting you extremely fatigued, sometimes to the point of feeling pukish. Then in the 2010’s we saw another variant of group interval conditioning classes explode promising super intense, calorie-torching workouts – think Spin classes, Orange Theory, and 9-Round. In the weight room, the focus has shifted toward powerlifting (standard barbell movements) and bodyweight exercises. Are these trends bad? Of course not. But recognize your bias. You probably believe that what you’re doing right now is the superior way to work out… because that’s what every generation thinks. The Lesson Workout trends fall in and out of favor like clothing styles. And it’s often thought that every new wave is better than the previous one. However, history proves otherwise. Every era has its fans and its great-looking celebrities. They’re on board with the hot fitness methods of their respective time. So you can’t look at whatever methods athletes and celebrities are using as the “secret” to their success. Because in a different era they’d be doing something else. The last thing you need to do is see what others are doing and feel like that’s exactly how you need to exercise in order to get their look or athleticism. It’s okay to not be on-trend. What all the successful fitness fans from each generation have in common is that they stayed dedicated to exercising regularly and eating well. And this should tell us that a lot of exercise methods can work if done with effort and consistency. So, find a form of exercise (or a few) that you’re interested in because you’re much more likely to stay consistent if you do. If you think about it, when people fail to get fit, it’s not because they didn’t try to change their lifestyle; it’s because the lifestyle changes they made were unrealistic or misguided. For example, when beginning to exercise, many otherwise intelligent adults ignore the universal life lesson of taking things one step at a time, and instead think, “I’ve never exercised before, so why don’t I begin like a Navy SEAL?” That’s just not realistic or sustainable for most people. So it’s no surprise that trend-chasers will often think that to get into better shape, they must either be a gym rat or do extreme routines like the ones we see athletes and models doing in the media. It’s simply not true. Sure, if you’re trying to become a bodybuilder or a high-level athlete, you have to exercise like one. However, if you’re someone who’s interested in simply getting into shape, you certainly don’t need to organize your entire life around kitchens and gyms. You just need to improve your eating habits in a realistic way that fits your lifestyle, and make sure you’re getting regular exercise (in forms you enjoy) on most days of the week. That’s how you ensure consistency, and consistency is the common thread that runs between athletes and the great-looking celebrities from each era. Diet Trends In 1972 the Atkins diet was created and variations of it have continued to make a comeback every decade since. (Believe it or not, before it became a hit among the masses, the extremely low-carb diet was first administered by a doctor named William Banting in the 1800’s.) In the
Origin: Avoid the Trend Traps!

Tip: Avoid Labels that Make You a Victim

Want to get in shape? Develop a mindset of unshakable determination and a belief that you can change yourself. Want to stay shackled to your current circumstances? Develop the belief that you have an illness and it’s out of your control. The American Medical Association (AMA) may be helping the obese do the latter. The Study Researchers studied the behavior of obese people who read an article regarding the AMA’s decision to call obesity a “disease.” Those who read the article were more likely to choose high calorie foods and less likely to self-regulate than those who didn’t. According to the study, the only upshot in believing they had a disease was that test subjects exhibited more “body-love” as a result. What This Tells Us Believing that your weight problem is a disease will make you more likely to embrace it. On the flipside, believing you have a problem that’s manageable, reversible, preventable, and within your power to change, will make you more likely to self-regulate and take the onus to lose weight. The self-esteem of these study participants may have been cushioned by a word that improved their body image, but is that form of “body-love” worth Type II diabetes, dependency on prescription meds, and a shortened lifespan? Obesity will not be reduced by making people feel comfortable about being obese, nor will instilling a false sense of helplessness and contrived victimhood. What You Can Take Away The AMA’s verbiage keeps fat people fat. Perhaps a better message would be that while genetics or medical conditions may load the gun, it doesn’t mean you have to pull the trigger and reload twice. You are not helpless when it comes to your fitness level and quality of life. Accept that and you’ll realize that new, better behaviors can mitigate the problem. The first step is to stop thinking like a victim. Off The Record Even if you’re not obese, you may have labeled yourself with other “diseases” – things you’ve accepted as unavoidable and unchangeable. Maybe you’ve accepted your fate as being skinny-fat, or a non-athlete, a hard-gainer, a junk food addict, a weakling, a wallflower, or a person with no self-discipline. If you’ve embraced these or any other self-limiting labels, then realize that you’re living up to low expectations. Chances are, these things are under your control. You just need to drop the helpless sufferer status and do something about it. References Hoyt, Crystal L., Jeni L. Burnette, and Lisa Auster-Gussman. “Obesity Is a Disease” Psychological Science, 24 Jan. 2014. Web. 9 Dec. 2014. “Labeling obesity as a disease may have psychological costs – association for psychological science.” Association for Psychological Science. 28 Jan. 2014.
Origin: Tip: Avoid Labels that Make You a Victim

Tip: Another Reason to Avoid Low-Fat Milk

First off, let me dispel some of the usual crap you hear about milk in general: The China Study This milk-shaking and oft-referred to study reported that casein, the primary protein in milk, causes cancer, but that doesn’t hold up when you look closely at epidemiological studies. Besides, there’s a lot of casein in mother’s milk. That would be a pretty silly idea on nature’s part if it were to cause cancer. That would be a biological error on par with nature placing a rhino’s genitals on his horn. Every time he butted another rhino, wham! Another generation would go down the tubes. Growth Hormone Yeah, maybe milk contains a little bit of GH, but cows produce it naturally and the levels found in the milk of cows treated with it hasn’t been found to be any higher than cows not treated with it. Besides, GH is a protein. It doesn’t get absorbed in its entirety. Do you think if you eat an egg, it gets absorbed intact, eventually ending up in your liver next to some bacon at Bob’s 24-Hour Bacteria Breakfast Bistro? No, it gets broken down into its constituent amino acids when it hits your digestive system, just like GH does. Whole Milk vs. Low-Fat or Fat-Free Milk Take away all the nutritional mythology and milk is a fairly decent drink, filled with protein, minerals, and, in the right circumstances, nutrients. It’s important to drink whole milk, though. Whole milk drinkers have been shown to have fewer incidences of cancer, diabetes, and heart disease than drinkers of skim milk, and whole milk has also been shown to grow more muscle than skim milk, possibly because of the CLA (conjugated linoleic acid) it contains. Skim milk is also less functionally nutritious and it has to do with how they make it. They remove all the fat, thereby removing all the fat-soluble vitamins like A and D. They then have to fortify the milk by adding those vitamins back in, but unless you’re drinking the milk with some fatty food, those vitamins won’t get absorbed. All that being said, a new study reveals a surprising and compelling new reason to choose whole over skim or low fat and it has to do with estrogen. What They Did Scientists herded up 109 postmenopausal women to see what drinking milk would do to their endocrine levels. (They chose postmenopausal women because they wouldn’t be susceptible to the daily and hourly fluctuations in natural estrogen levels seen in premenopausal women). Each test subject drank 1 liter of semi-skimmed milk (1.5% milk fat) per day for four days, and 1 liter of whole milk (3.5% milk fat) per day for four days, interspersed with a four-day washout period. The scientists measured sex hormone levels in 24-hour urine samples collected after each 4-day period. What They Found The lower-fat milk ended up causing much higher estrogen levels than the whole milk did. That’s not to say the lower-fat milk had more estrogen in it than the whole milk. Instead, it had to do with the way the body handled the estrogen in the milk after drinking it. “Milk consumption resulted in a significant increase in urinary estrone (E1) excretion, whereas estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), and 16ketoE2 excretion only increased after semi-skimmed milk consumption.” Moreover, the semi-skimmed milk led to a higher percentage of conjugated estrogens, which are the most bioavailable form of estrogen and have a longer half-life. They’re also the type found in birth control pills. The scientists theorized that maybe the fat in the whole milk inhibited the enzymes needed to deconjugate the estrogen. What This Means to You Drinking skim milk can contribute to having higher-than-desirable estrogen levels, making it harder to put on muscle and easier to gain fat. It can also lead to heart problems. Granted, the women in this study were drinking a lot of milk – a liter, or a little more than 4 cups a day. Most of us don’t drink that much unless you’re one of those GOMAD (gallon of milk a day) bodybuilders who, after they’re curdled and aged, turn into giant blocks of cheese. Still, even if you’re only drinking average amounts of milk – either for the protein it contains, its nutrients, or as a tasty topping for your oatmeal or cereal – you’re better off drinking whole
Origin: Tip: Another Reason to Avoid Low-Fat Milk

Tip: 3 Strength Training Mistakes to Avoid

Strength Basics Getting stronger is pretty simple when you break it down. If you’re doing basic, whole-body compound movements like squatting, hinging (deadlifting etc.), pushing, pulling, and carrying heavy objects, then you’re on the right track. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people out there selling gimmicky programs and exercises that will make you anything but strong. To help you reach your goals and make sure you’re not wasting your time on someone else’s BS, don’t make these mistakes. Mistake 1 – Overcomplicating Exercises When it comes to compound movements, simple is generally better. Holding a kettlebell by the handle overhead with one arm as you do a horizontal banded press with the other arm while standing on one foot on an unstable surface is not “achieving core activation, balance, and coordination.” It’s just making you look like a douchebag. Being a functionally strong human being requires that your muscles work together to lift or resist an external load. If you’re trying to do too many things at once, your body won’t be able to recruit the necessary motor neurons to get your muscles to synergistically fire. If your body can’t get an appreciable amount of muscle involved to lift or resist an external load, then you won’t get strong. It really is as simple as that. Picking simple compound movements like the back squat, trap-bar deadlift, pull-up, and press – and doing them with a lot of weight – will make you infinitely stronger than doing combined exercises such as lunging while doing curls. Trying to do multiple movements in one exercise is like a baseball pitcher thinking he needs to take up juggling in order to throw the ball harder. Confusing your body arbitrarily doesn’t mean you’re getting any closer to achieving your goal. Mistake 2 – Doing Too Much Isolation Work If you’re a natural lifter, you need to start seeing your body as one unit instead of a lot of individual parts. If you’re the person who does chest/triceps on Mondays, legs on Tuesdays, and back/biceps on Fridays, you’re probably not seeing the results you’d like see. It’s not from a lack of effort, but from a lack of good strategy and programming. You’re in a weird situation where you’re both doing too much work and not nearly enough work at the same time. Performing ten different chest exercises for 3-5 sets each on Monday is too much volume that day (if you’re not juicing). At the same time, you’re doing nothing with the chest the rest of the week, so it’s not being worked frequently enough. If you’re on this type of program, your progress is going to stall out quickly. Instead, try to do whole-body lifts three times per week. Not sure where to start? Use the 3 day per week template below. This program will have you doing five exercises per day and will allow you to train your body frequently enough to get some results. You’ll squat, hinge, lunge, push, pull, and carry heavy objects – all the stuff that makes a person strong. Day 1 A1 Back Squat:5×5 A2 Dumbbell Bench Press:5×8 A3 1-Arm Dumbbell Row:5×10 B1 Farmer’s Walk:3×20 yards B2 Pallof Press: 3×10 each side Day 2 A1 Standing Barbell Strict Press:5×5 A2 Pull-Up:5×8 A3 Step-Back Lunges:5×8 each B1 Waiter’s Carry: 3×20 yards B2 Hanging Knee Raises:3×10 Day 3 A1 Trap Bar Deadlift:3×5 A2 Incline Dumbbell Bench Press:5×8 A3 Chest-Supported Row:5×10 B1 Suitcase Carry (a farmer’s walk carrying weight only on one side):3×20 yards B2 Cable Chop: 3×10 each side Mistake 3 – Using Percentage Training (If You’re a Newbie) When you’re just starting out, using a program based off a percentage of your one rep max is a mistake. Asking strong guys what program they’re doing can help you with your goals, but only if you have a similar training background. If you’re a beginner and the person you’re asking recommends a program based off a percentage of your 1RM, you should probably find a new program. New lifters shouldn’t be basing anything off of a one rep max because they don’t have the experience to perform a true 1RM. The first couple of weeks when you begin a weight training program are some of the most fun weeks you’ll ever have. You’ll make tremendous progress because you’re learning to recruit motor neurons to carry out new movement patterns. The strength gains you make for the first 4-8 weeks will come in leaps and bounds, so you shouldn’t be limiting yourself by basing your program off of the perceived 1RM you could do on day one. Instead, try to work up to a weight that causes you technical failure: go as heavy as you can until your technique starts to break down. Do this for approximately 6 months to a year as you vary your exercises and rep ranges. Adopt a program based on percentages AFTER you’ve become proficient at your
Origin: Tip: 3 Strength Training Mistakes to Avoid